Webometric Thoughts

December 19, 2008

Merging Academia and Wikipedia

Filed under: Wikipedia,peer review — admin @ 11:13 am

There’s an interesting story at ReadWriteWeb about the journal RNA Biology insisting that authors submit a Wikipedia stub article along with their main journal article (see guidelines). Rather than a stub article in the main Wikipedia space, it is merely asking for a stub article within the author’s user space, although for some articles a main Wikipedia stub may be more appropriate. ReadWriteWeb comments:

The relationship between academia and the Wikipedia has always been an uneasy one, and it will be interesting to see how the academic community is going to react to this experiment.

With the majority of stubs being placed in user-spaces, rather than the main Wikipedia space, it is likely to be perceived as extra work with little extra benefit by academics. It will, however, hopefully encourage more academics to contribute to Wikipedia more widely, which can only be a good thing for Wikipedia.

Does the academic community have an ‘uneasy’ relationship with Wikipedia? Or merely get exasperated with some of the more crowd-happy evangelists, and those who fail to recognise its potential drawbacks. The crowd is great up to a point, but there is still a place for experts and authoritative sources.


  1. yd@huzzahs.suzerain” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

    Trackback by jackie — November 30, 2014 @ 4:43 am

  2. schapiro@arger.upperclassmen” rel=”nofollow”>.…


    Trackback by mathew — December 16, 2014 @ 12:16 pm

  3. uncharted@bien.outbreaks” rel=”nofollow”>.…


    Trackback by ron — February 5, 2015 @ 5:09 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress